Banijay & All3: Why 2026 Could Be the Year of Global Format Consolidation

Feeling swamped by headline mergers and format fatigue? Here’s a clear, actionable guide to what Banijay & All3 mean — for networks, producers and local hits like MasterChef.

Consolidation in international TV is no longer a rumor in trade columns — it’s a market force reshaping who owns shows, who commissions local versions and how money flows across territories. For entertainment professionals and curious viewers alike, the rapid talks between Banijay and All3Media’s parent (RedBird/IMI) in early 2026 are an early signal of a year that promises big library mergers, tighter distribution bundles and fresh pressure on independent producers. This article breaks down the stakes, names the likely winners and losers, and gives practical steps creators, buyers and local broadcasters can use right now.

Why 2026 could be the year of format consolidation

The headline about Banijay and All3Media isn’t an isolated event — it’s the visible crest of several converging trends:

• Streaming rationalization: Big streamers tightened commissioning in late 2024–2025 and are now picking proven formats over experimental slates. That increases demand for established format libraries.
• Cost pressures: Advertiser caution and weaker subscription growth forced major players to extract more value from existing IP rather than fund entirely new global tentpoles.
• Scale economics: Owning multiple regional rights and production arms reduces friction when selling season packages to platforms and broadcasters worldwide.
• Data-driven greenlighting: Advanced format analytics make global rollouts more predictable, favoring owners with large catalogs and cross-market performance data.

Those forces were visible in late 2025 and crystallized in early 2026: M&A chatter grew from sporadic takeover offers to coordinated discussions between large format owners. As one industry newsletter observed in January 2026, "already, there have been plenty of signs that consolidation will be the buzzword of 2026 in international entertainment."

“Already, there have been plenty of signs that consolidation will be the buzzword of 2026 in international entertainment.” — International Insider (Jan 2026)

Banijay & All3: what the move actually means

Reports in early 2026 confirmed deep discussions between Banijay and All3’s parent group about merging production assets. To be clear: this is not just another corporate headline. If consummated, the deal would combine two of the largest independent format owners and production houses, creating a single entity with an enormous distribution reach, buyer relationships and talent networks.

Key strategic outcomes to expect from such a combination:

• Library consolidation: One-stop access to more formats for global buyers — easier bundling for broadcasters and platforms.
• Centralized sales teams: Fewer intermediaries and streamlined negotiations for licensing and remakes.
• Production footprint: Greater ability to shift production to lower-cost territories or to scale local versions quickly.
• Cross-format innovation: Internal cross-pollination that creates hybrid formats and IP spin-offs faster than independent competitors can react.

Why this matters for formats like MasterChef

MasterChef is a quintessential global format: highly localizable, commercially resilient and a reliable ratings driver in many territories. Under wider consolidation, MasterChef-style formats may see both benefits and constraints:

• Faster rollouts: A consolidated sales machine can push new seasons or special editions into multiple territories simultaneously.
• Standardized format control: More rigorous central governance can protect brand integrity — but also reduce local creative freedom.
• Monetization layers: Bundled deals could pair format rights with merchandising, podcast tie-ins, or global streaming windows, increasing revenue per territory.

In short: formats like MasterChef stand to gain scale and new monetization, but they risk homogenization if local producers can’t negotiate format flexibility.

Winners and losers of 2026 consolidation

Winners

• Large format owners and shareholders: Economies of scale, higher bargaining power and broader buyer relationships translate into improved margins.
• Global streamers and broadcasters: Easier access to multi-territory format packages for regional programming and simultaneous launches — and a need for stronger technical ops like zero-downtime release pipelines to synchronize cross-border launches.
• Format buyers in growth markets: Consolidated catalogs can speed up market entry with proven shows and predictable licensing terms.
• Advertisers and brand partners: Bundled distribution across countries increases campaign reach and measurement.

Losers

• Independent producers: Smaller companies may find it harder to compete for commissions or sell formats if buyers prefer negotiating with a single large supplier. Independents should study micro-recognition and community tactics to build direct audiences and niche leverage.
• Local creative variances: Standardization pressures could limit experimentation in localized storytelling and casting choices.
• Regional sales agents and boutique distributors: Consolidation threatens the middlemen who historically packaged formats into niche markets.
• Regulatory scrutiny and public pushback: Larger entities invite antitrust review and potential restrictions, especially in Europe and the UK — watch regulatory guidance and competition filings closely.

Regulatory and market risks to watch in 2026

Mergers at this scale rarely go unchallenged. Expect regulatory themes to dominate the back half of 2026:

• Antitrust probes: European competition authorities and the UK regulator are attentive to market concentration in media and distribution.
• Cultural quotas and plurality rules: Public broadcasters and regulators may demand guarantees for local production quotas and editorial independence.
• Labor pushback: Unions and talent agencies may resist centralized contract terms that undercut local talent compensation or residuals.

For dealmakers, navigating these risks will require transparent remedies: regional carve-outs, guaranteed local commissions, or licensing pools that preserve competitive access for smaller partners.

What producers, broadcasters and creators should do now — practical, actionable advice

Whether you’re a small indie producer, a regional broadcaster or a showrunner, consolidation changes the rules — but you can respond strategically. Below are practical steps tailored to each stakeholder.

For independent producers

1. Own and protect IP early: Where possible, retain format ownership or secure clear backend participation. Buyers increasingly value creator-aligned ownership and you’ll be in a better position if catalogs consolidate.
2. Specialize and differentiate: Develop distinct format signatures (e.g., hyper-local cultural angles, host-driven hooks, or interactive elements) that make your IP non-substitutable.
3. Pursue co-productions: Partner with international peers to create jointly owned formats — that dilutes acquisition risk and increases bargaining power.
4. Lean into short-form and digital-first pilots: Platforms want proof points. Use short-run tests on OTT or social-first channels to build data that proves audience demand.
5. Use analytics to prove value: Implement format KPIs and lightweight datastores — retention, format lift, demographic penetration — and present measurable case studies when pitching buyers.

For broadcasters and streamers

1. Negotiate modular licenses: Instead of all-or-nothing rights, ask for regionally tiered access and flexible windows to preserve budget control.
2. Protect local identity: Demand creative clauses in format licenses that allow for cultural tailoring to maintain audience resonance.
3. Invest in local talent development: Bigger owners excel at scale — counterbalance by funding local showrunners and production houses to cultivate unique IP.
4. Explore revenue sharing: Co-invest in format upgrades (live shows, events, merchandising) with format owners to align incentives and reduce upfront fees; look to staging-as-a-service models when planning physical extensions.

For format owners and rights holders

1. Create tiered licensing: Offer premium global bundles alongside cheaper, shorter-term local packages to capture diverse buyers.
2. Monetize data and format blueprints: Sell performance analytics, format playbooks and training to buyers as revenue add-ons — consider building a commercial arm around data bridges and provenance.
3. Build modular formats: Make your format building blocks (challenges, rounds, scoring) replaceable so local partners can adapt without violating brand integrity.
4. Invest in format R&D: Use small-scale experiments to incubate spin-offs that can be rolled out to the consolidated sales machine; support social-first pilots using lightweight kits like compact live-stream kits for quick validation.

For talent and creative teams

1. Negotiate residuals and credits: As rights ownership consolidates, insist on backend participation or escalator clauses tied to global rollouts.
2. Brand yourself: Build personal IP — host-led formats and creator brands increase bargaining leverage.
3. Consider production equity: Seek executive-producer stakes in local adaptations to capture upside from global deals.

How consolidation will reshape licensing and distribution mechanics

Expect a structural shift in how formats are sold and distributed:

• Bundled rights negotiations: Buyers will increasingly be offered regional or multi-format bundles that lock in multiple territories and seasons.
• Data-backed pricing: Licensing fees will be more formulaic — based on comparable performance metrics across markets rather than opaque negotiations.
• Faster cross-border rollouts: A consolidated entity can synchronize launches and advertising partnerships across markets, optimizing global promotion.

Those changes favor buyers looking for scale but put pressure on smaller producers who previously relied on bespoke licensing deals.

Future predictions: what to expect from 2026 into 2028

Based on early-2026 signals, here are credible trajectories to watch:

• More strategic M&A among format owners: Several mid-sized producers will seek partnerships or exit offers rather than face competitive squeeze.
• Rise of ‘super-libraries’: A few conglomerates will control the majority of marquee reality and competition formats, creating leverage over streamers and broadcasters.
• Regulatory countermeasures: Expect negotiated remedies — guaranteed local commissions or licensing pools — imposed as conditions on large deals.
• Growth in emerging markets: Consolidators will push formats aggressively into India, Southeast Asia and Africa, where local demand and lower production costs are attractive.
• Short-form spin-offs: Big format owners will farm out micro-versions to social platforms, capturing younger audiences and new ad revenue streams — a clear playbook is emerging in short-form food and micro-menu content.

Case study: how a hypothetical MasterChef rollout changes under consolidation

Imagine a consolidated owner with MasterChef in its catalog. Under the new scale logic, they could:

1. Licensing: Offer a single deal to a pan-regional broadcaster for multiple national versions and a streaming window for the global rights holder.
2. Production: Centralize production management (formats, key creative hires) but allow localized rounds and culturally specific challenges to maintain authenticity.
3. Monetization: Layer in global sponsorships, merchandise, and an international streaming special (e.g., "MasterChef All-Stars: International") to boost margins — and use modern revenue playbooks such as tokenized commerce & staged monetization for events and merch.

Outcome: Faster, more lucrative rollouts — but only if the consolidated owner balances brand control with local creative freedom. Producers who can deliver both will be rewarded; those who can’t may be sidelined.

Practical checklist: 10 immediate moves for survival and growth

• Audit and secure IP ownership and residual clauses in current contracts.
• Build a short-form pilot to prove format adaptability for digital platforms.
• Negotiate flexible creative clauses when licensing formats to large owners.
• Seek co-production agreements to share risk and secure distribution.
• Invest in format performance analytics to strengthen pitches.
• Explore regional co-ownership with rising local media groups.
• Develop a global extension plan (events, merchandising, podcasts) to present to buyers.
• Push for carve-outs or protections in any regional licensing bundles.
• Strengthen relationships with talent agents to protect host and judge deals across territories.
• Monitor regulatory filings and competition authority updates — they can create negotiation leverage, and guidance such as EU policy signals matter for media deals.

Final takeaways

Banijay’s early-2026 move toward All3-style asset consolidation is less an end and more an inflection point. The entertainment business is moving toward fewer, more powerful format owners with the ability to sell global packages and squeeze margins on smaller suppliers. That shift creates winners — consolidated owners, global buyers and certain local producers aligned with scale — and losers — independent producers and middle-market distributors banked on fragmented rights.

For stakeholders, the imperative is clear: protect IP, create measurable proof points, and aim for partnerships that combine scale with local creative control. Those who adapt — by owning part of their IP, co-producing, or proving clear audience impact via data — will thrive in the 2026 consolidation landscape. Those who rely solely on bespoke, single-territory deals risk marginalization.

What we’ll be watching next

Watch for formal deal filings, competition authority conditions, and the first large-scale bundled licensing offers to streamers. Also watch which independent producers secure co-ownership deals — they’ll be the model for mid-market survival. Finally, monitor how top formats like MasterChef evolve their licensing terms: the answers there will set the tone for how local creative control is preserved (or not) in this new era.

If you’re a producer, buyer or creative navigating this change, start with the checklist above and consider building a negotiation team focused on IP and data. Consolidation is not just about scale — it’s about who can move fastest while protecting the integrity and cultural resonance of local content.

Call to action

Want a concise negotiation checklist tailored to your role (producer, broadcaster or talent)? Subscribe to our weekly analysis for a downloadable, customizable checklist and case studies from 2025–2026 deals. Share this article with colleagues and sign up to get short, verified briefings when big format moves break.

Related Reading

• Why Short‑Form Food Videos Evolved Into Micro‑Menu Merchants in 2026
• Practical Playbook: Responsible Web Data Bridges in 2026
• Regulatory Watch: EU Synthetic Media Guidelines and On‑Device Voice — Implications for Phones (2026)
• Why Microdrops and Live‑Ops Are the New Growth Engine for Small Streamers (2026)
• Game Maps and Growing Minds: What New Multiplayer Levels Teach About Attention and Problem Solving
• Design a 'Media Diet' to Protect Your Mental Health During Entertainment Overload
• Why Cotton, Corn and Wheat Diverged This Week: A Data-Driven Recap
• Monetize Your Run Club with Premium Vertical Content: A How-To
• Rituals for Reunion: BTS’s New Album and Reconnecting After Time Apart